Engajamento acadêmico em estudantes de pós-graduação na Colômbia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2024.44.1895Palavras-chave:
estudantes de pós-graduação, engajamento acadêmico, modelos de equações estruturais, pós-pandemia, ColômbiaResumo
O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar as percepções de engajamento acadêmico em estudantes de pós-graduação de seis universidades da cidade de Cali, Colômbia. Com abordagem quantitativa, aplicou-se o "Questionário de Engajamento do aluno" (The Student Engagement Questionnaire) e utilizou-se uma metodologia de análise de modelos de equações estruturais. De modo geral, os alunos pesquisados apresentaram percepções favoráveis de seu programa acadêmico. Além disso, as percepções positivas sobre as relações dentro do ambiente de ensino-aprendizagem tiveram um impacto favorável no desenvolvimento do trabalho em equipe e das competências de ordem superior (pensamento crítico, aprendizagem autogestionária, entre outras). Esta pesquisa contribui para a compreensão do engajamento acadêmico em estudantes de pós-graduação em um contexto latino-americano pós-pandemia e faz recomendações em nível institucional para promover o engajamento de estudantes de pós-graduação.
Downloads
Referências
Almarghani, Erman M. e Ivana Mijatovic (2017), “Factors affecting student engagement in HEIs - it is all about good teaching”, Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 22, núm. 8, pp. 940-956, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1319808.
Almerich, Gonzalo, Jesús Suárez-Rodríguez, Isabel Díaz-García y Natividad Orellana (2020a), “Estructura de las competencias del siglo XXI en alumnado del ámbito educativo. Factores personales influyentes”, Educación XX1, vol. 23, núm. 1, pp. 45-74, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.23853.
Almerich, Gonzalo, Jesús Suárez‐Rodríguez, Isabel Díaz‐García y Sara Cebrián‐Cifuentes (2020b), “21st-century competences: The relation of ICT competences with higher-order thinking capacities and teamwork competences in university students”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 36, núm. 4, pp. 468-479, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/JCAL.12413.
Barreto Osma, Doris Amparo, Carlos German Celis Estupiñan e Iris Aleida Pinzón Arteaga (2019), “Estudiantes universitarios que trabajan: subjetividad, construcción de sentido e in-satisfacción”, Revista Virtual Universidad Católica Del Norte, vol. 58, pp. 96-115, DOI: https://doi.org/10.35575/rvucn.n58a4.
Bedenlier, Svenja, Melissa Bond, Katja Buntins, Olaf Zawacki-Richter y Michael Kerres (2020), “Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities”, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 34, núm. 4, pp. 126-150, DOI: https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/5477.
Boulton, Chris A., Emily Hughes, Carmel Kent, Joanne R. Smith y Hywel TP Williams (2019), “Student engagement and wellbeing over time at a higher education institution”, Plos One, vol. 14, núm. 11, pp. 1-20, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0225770.
Bond, Melissa, Katja Buntins, Svenja Bedenlier, Olaf Zawacki-Richter y Michael Kerres (2020), “Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map”, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 17, núm. 2, pp. 1-30, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-019-0176-8.
Bowden, Jana Lay-Hwa, Leonie Tickle y Kay Naumann (2021), “The four pillars of tertiary student engagement and success: a holistic measurement approach”, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 46, núm. 6, pp. 1207-1224, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672647.
Bozkurt, Aras y Ramesh C. Sharma (2020). “Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic”, Asian Journal of Distance Education, vol. 15, núm. 1, pp. i–vi, <http://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/447> [Consulta: septiembre de 2022].
Burch, Gerald F., Nathan A. Heller, Jana J. Burch, Rusty Freed y Steve A. Steed (2015), “Student engagement: Developing a conceptual framework and survey instrument”, Journal of Education for Business, vol. 90, núm. 4, pp. 224-229, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.1019821.
Chickering, Arthur W. y Zelda F. Gamson (1987), “Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate Education”, American Association of Higher Education (AAHE), vol. 3, pp. 3-7, <https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED282491.pdf> [Consulta: septiembre de 2022].
Czerniewicz, Laura, Najma Agherdien, Johan Badenhorst, Dina Belluigi, Tracey Chambers, Muntuwenkosi Chili y Magriet De Villiers (2020), “A Wake-Up Call: Equity, Inequality and Covid-19 Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning”, Postdigital Science and Education, vol. 2, núm. 3, pp. 946-967, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00187-4.
Daura, Florencia (2022), “El caso de la Universidad Austral: comparación del compromiso académico, la tenacidad y el rendimiento en estudiantes de un posgrado presencial y en línea”, Papeles: Revista de la Facultad de Educación Universidad Antonio Nariño, vol. 14, núm. 27, pp. 154-172, DOI: https://doi.org/10.54104/papeles.v14n27.1241.
Dixson, Marcia D. (2015), “Measuring student engagement in the online course: The Online Student Engagement scale (OSE)”, Online Learning, vol. 19, núm. 4, pp. 1-15, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.561.
Escobar, Germán A. y Laura Botero (2021), “Factores asociados al compromiso académico en universitarios de carreras virtuales: revisión de las principales teorías e instrumentos”, Panorama, vol. 15, núm. 28, pp. 54-76, <https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=343965146003> [Consulta: diciembre de 2023].
Fornell, Claes y David F. Larcker (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 18, núm. 1, pp. 39–50, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.
Fredricks, Jennifer A. y Wendy McColskey (2012), “The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments”, Handbook of research on student engagement, Springer US, pp. 763-782, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_37.
Gargallo, Bernardo, Jesús M. Suárez-Rodríguez, Gonzalo Almerich, Irene Verde y Maria Àngels Cebrià i Iranzo (2018), “The dimensional validation of the Student Engagement Questionnaire (SEQ) with a Spanish university population. Students’ capabilities and the teaching”, Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, vol. 34, núm. 3, pp. 519–530, DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.34.3.299041.
Gargallo-López, Bernardo, Cruz Pérez Pérez, Miguel Ángel Jiménez Rodríguez, Noelia Martínez Hervás y Juan Antonio Giménez Beut (2017), “Métodos centrados en el aprendizaje, implicación del alumno y percepción del contexto de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios”, Educación XX1, vol. 20, núm. 2, pp. 161-187, <https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/706/70651145007.pdf> [Consulta: septiembre de 2022].
Giannini, Stefanía (2020), “Covid-19 y educación superior: De los efectos inmediatos al día después”, Revista Latinoamericana de Educación Comparada, vol. 11, núm. 17, pp. 1-57, <https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/COVID-19-ES-130520.pdf> [Consulta: septiembre de 2022].
Hagenauer, Gerda y Simone E. Volet (2014), “Teacher–student relationship at university: an important yet under-researched field”, Oxford Review of Education, vol. 40, núm. 3, pp. 370–388, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.921613.
Hair, Joseph F., William C. Black, Barry J. Babin, Rolph E. Anderson y Ronald L. Tatham (2010), Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (vol. 7), Upper Saddle River, NJ, Pearson.
Hernández, Roberto, Carlos Fernández y Pilar Baptista (2014), Metodología de la investigación, vol. 6, Mc Graw-Hill, México.
Hodges, Charles B., Stephanie Moore, Barbara B. Lockee, Torrey Trust y Mark Aaron Bond (2020), “The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning”, EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 3, pp. 1-12, <http://hdl.handle.net/10919/104648> [Consulta: septiembre de 2022].
Kahu, Ella R. (2013), “Framing student engagement in higher education”, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 38, núm. 5, pp. 758-773, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505.
Kember, David y Doris YP Leung (2009), “Development of a questionnaire for assessing students’ perceptions of the teaching and learning environment and its use in quality assurance”, Learning Environments Research, vol. 12, núm. 1, pp. 15-29, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-008-9050-7.
Kline, Rex B. (2011), “Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling”, The SAGE handbook of innovation in social research methods, SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 562-589, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268261.
Kuh, George D. (2009), “The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations”, New Directions for Institutional Research, vol. 2009, núm. 141, pp. 5-20, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283.
Lasso, Luis A. (2020), “Análisis de la formación posgradual a nivel de maestría y doctorado en Colombia entre 2010 y 2018”, Revista Espacios, vol. 41, núm. 48, pp. 161-176, DOI: https://doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a20v41n48p12.
Leach, Linda (2016), “Enhancing student engagement in one institution”, Journal of Further and Higher Education, vol. 40, núm. 1, pp. 23-47, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2013.869565.
Lei, Hao, Yunhuo Cui y Wenye Zhou (2018), “Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis”, Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, vol. 46, núm. 3, pp. 517-528, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054.
Mandernach, B. Jean (2015), “Assessment of student engagement in higher education: A synthesis of literature and assessment tools”, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 12, núm. 2, pp. 1-14, <https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/367> [Consulta: septiembre de 2022].
Marquez, Amanda (2020), “The graduate student experience: The parents’ perspective”, Alliant International University ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, <https://search.proquest.com/openview/1361a0db49a6a37588ad9cf68473e3ba/1.pdf?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y> [Consulta: septiembre de 2022].
Navas, Lina P., Felipe Montes, Sepideh Abolghasem, Ricardo J. Salas, Mehdi Toloo y Roberto Zarama (2020), “Colombian higher education institutions Evaluation”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 71, núm. 100801, pp. 1-11, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100801.
Ospina Londoño, Mónica, Gustavo Canavire-Bacarreza, Santiago Bohórquez y Daniel Cuartas (2015), “Expansión de la educación superior y sus efectos en matriculación y migración: evidencia de Colombia”, Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, vol. 1, núm. 75, pp. 317-348, DOI: https://doi.org/10.13043/DYS.75.8.
Pedler, Megan, Suzanne Hudson y Tony Yeigh (2020), “The teachers’ role in student engagement: A Review”, Australian Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 45, núm. 3, pp. 48-62, DOI: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n3.4.
Pontius, Jason L. y Shaun R. Harper (2006), “Principles for good practice in graduate and professional student engagement”, New Directions for Student Services, vol. 2006, núm. 115, pp. 47-58, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/SS.215.
Rigg, Julaine, Jonathon Day y Howard Adler (2013), “Emotional exhaustion in graduate students: The role of engagement, self-efficacy and social support”, Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, vol. 3, núm. 2, pp. 138-152, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v3n2p138.
Ruiz, Miguel A., Antonio Pardo y Rafael San Martín (2010), “Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales”, Papeles Del Psicólogo, vol. 31, núm. 1, pp. 34-45, DOI: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=77812441004.
Salas‐Pilco, Sdenka Zobeida, Yuqin Yang y Zhe Zhang (2022), “Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic Review”. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 53, núm. 3, pp. 593-619, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.13190.
Schreiber, James B., Amaury Nora, Frances K. Stage, Elizabeth A. Barlow y Jamie King (2006), “Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A Review”, The Journal of Educational Research, vol. 99, núm. 6, pp. 323-338, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338.
Webber, Louis y Harriet Dismore (2021), “Mothers and higher education: balancing time, study and space”, Journal of Further and Higher Education, vol. 45, núm. 6, pp. 803-817, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1820458.
Weston, Rebecca y Paul A. Gore Jr. (2006), “A brief guide to structural equation modeling”, The Counseling Psychologist, vol. 34, núm. 5, pp. 719-751, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345.
Xerri, Matthew J., Katrina Radford y Kate Shacklock (2018), “Student engagement in academic activities: a social support perspective”, Higher Education, vol. 75, núm. 4, pp. 589-605, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10734-017-0162-9.
Yoo, Hyeon Jean y David T. Marshall (2022), “Understanding Graduate Student Parents: Influence of Parental Status, Gender, and Major on Graduate Students’ Motivation, Stress, and Satisfaction”, Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, vol. 46, núm. 3, pp. 409-426, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1962518.
Zapata-Cuervo, Natalia, Maricela I. Montes-Guerra, Hyejo Hailey Shin, Miyoung Jeong y Mi-Hea Cho (2021), “Students’ psychological perceptions toward online learning engagement and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative analysis of students in three”, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, vol. 35, núm. 2, pp. 108-122, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2021.1907195.
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
