Innovación con tecnologías digitales y fragilidad pedagógica: percepciones del profesorado universitario
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2026.49.2063Palabras clave:
educación superior, innovación docente, tecnologías digitales, fragilidad pedagógicaResumen
Este estudio analiza la percepción del profesorado universitario involucrado en proyectos de innovación con tecnologías digitales en relación con la fragilidad pedagógica. A partir de un cuestionario validado aplicado a 36 docentes, se identifican diferencias significativas entre la fragilidad individual e institucional. Los resultados sugieren una alta resiliencia personal frente a un entorno organizativo percibido como poco favorable. Se hallan correlaciones entre el reconocimiento institucional y menores niveles de fragilidad individual, así como entre esta última y dimensiones como la creatividad, la actitud ante el cambio y la resiliencia docente, lo que apunta a la necesidad de políticas que conecten las iniciativas del profesorado con condiciones organizativas favorables.
Descargas
Citas
Armada Pacheco, José Manuel (2023), “Desafíos de la docencia universitaria ante la educación 4.0”, e-Revista Multidisciplinaria del Saber, vol. 1, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.61286/e-rms.v1i.11>.
Akdeniz, Rahime Kübra y Tugba Konakli (2022), “The emergence, reasons and results of resistance to change in teachers”, International Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership, vol. 8, núm. 1, pp. 49-67, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.25233/ijlel.1107137>.
Bates, Anthony William (2019), Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning, Vancouver, BCcampus, <https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/>.
Beghetto, Ronald A. (2016), “Creative openings in the social interactions of teaching”, Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, vol. 3, núm. 2, pp. 261-273, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2016-0017>.
Benavides Pozo, Edgar Ulises, Jorge Byron Rodríguez Torres, Hipólito Antonio Rizzo Barco, Christian Luis Freire Contreras y Charli Manuel Bustamante Montaño (2025), “Innovación pedagógica en la educación superior: retos y oportunidades en la era digital”, Prospherus, vol. 2, núm. 2, pp. 84-97, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.63535/7avkst33>.
Benito, Bárbara de, Alexandra Lizana y Jesús Salinas (2017), “Using concept mapping for faculty development in the context of pedagogic frailty”, Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, vol. 9, núm. 3, pp. 329-347, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2017.09.020>.
Chauca, Mario, Ynes Phun, Olga Curro, Carmen Chauca, Ramiro Yallico y Virgilio Quispe (2021), “Disruptive innovation in active activity-based learning methodologies through digital transformation”, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 11, núm. 4, pp. 200-204, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.18178/IJIET.2021.11.4.1512>.
Deacon, B., Melissa Laufer, Maricia Aline Mende, Tiana Tschache y Len Ole Schäfer (2025), “Resisting digital change at the university: an exploration into triggers and organisational countermeasures”, European Journal of Higher Education, vol. 15, núm. 1, pp. 119-142, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2025.2512735>.
Drugova, Elena, Irina Zhuravleva, Marina Aiusheeva y Daria Grits (2021), “Toward a model of learning innovation integration: TPACK-SAMR based analysis of the introduction of a digital learning environment in three russian universities”, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 26, núm. 4, pp. 4 925-4 942, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10514-2>.
Ertmer, Peggy A. y Anna Ottenbreit-Leftwich (2013), “Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning”, Computers & Education, vol. 64, pp. 175-182, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008>.
Esteve-Mon, Francesc M., María Ángeles Llopis-Nebot, Virginia Viñoles-Cosentino y Jordi Adell-Segura (2022), “Digital teaching competence of university teachers: Levels and teaching typologies”, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), vol. 17, núm. 13, pp. 200-216, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.3991/ ijet.v17i13.24345>.
Fernandes, Sandra, Marta Abelha, Anabela Carvalho Alves y Teresa Ferreira Oliveira (2024), “Editorial: Pedagogic innovation and student learning in higher education: perceptions, practices and challenges”, Frontiers in Education, vol. 9, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1336214>.
Fullan, Michael (2013), Stratosphere: Integrating technology, pedagogy, and change knowledge, Toronto, Pearson.García-Peñalvo, Francisco José y María Soledad
Ramírez-Montoya (2017), “Aprendizaje, innovación y competitividad: la sociedad del aprendizaje”, Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), vol. 17, núm. 52, <https://revistas.um.es/red/article/view/282141>.
González, Olga y Cristina Hennig (2020), “Las fragilidades de la innovación educativa”, Espacios, vol. 41, núm, 37, pp. 1-10, <https://www.revistaespacios.com/a20v41n37/20413720.html>.
Guillén-Gámez, Francisco D., Julio Ruiz-Palmero, Enrique Sánchez-Rivas y Ernesto Colomo-Magaña (2020), “ICT resources for research: an ANOVA analysis on the digital research skills of higher education teachers comparing the areas of knowledge within each gender”, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 25, pp. 4 575-4 589, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10176-6>.
Hidayat, Rais, Yuyun Elizabeth Patras y Yuli Muliyawati (2024), “Digital leadership and professional commitment to enhance teacher innovativeness as a priority strategy”, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 23, núm. 10, 252-271, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.10.12>.
Iancu, Alina Eugenia, Andrei Rusu, Cristina Măroiu, Roxana Păcurar y Laurentiu P. Maricuţoiu (2018), “The effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing teacher burnout: A meta-analysis”, Educational Psychology Review, vol. 30, núm. 2, pp. 373-396, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9420-8>.
Kinchin, Ian. M. (2023), “Five moves towards an ecological university”, Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 28, núm. 5, pp. 918-932, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2197108>.
Kinchin, Ian M. (2019), “The salutogenic management of pedagogic frailty: A case of educational theory development using concept mapping”, Education Sciences, vol. 9, núm. 2, pp. 1-13, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020157>.
Kinchin, Ian M. (2017), “Visualising the pedagogic frailty model as a frame for the scholarship of teaching and learning”, PSU Research Review, vol. 1, núm. 3, pp. 184-193, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1108/PRR-12-2016-0013>.
Kinchin, Ian M. (2015), “Pedagogic frailty: an initial consideration of aetiology and prognosis”, ponencia presentada en la SRHE Annual Research Conference 2015, Newport, <https://srhe.ac.uk/arc/conference2015/abstracts/0026.pdf>.
Kinchin, Ian M., Kieran Balloo, Laura Barnett, Karen Gravett, Marion Heron, Anesa Hosein, Simon Lygo-Baker, Emma Meland, Naomi Winstone y Nadya Yakovchuk (2023), “Poems and pedagogic frailty: uncovering the affective within teacher development through collective biography”, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, vol. 22, núm. 3, pp. 305-321, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1177/14740222221147483>.
Kinchin, Ian M., E. Alpay, K. Curtis, J. Franklin, C. Rivers y N. E. Winstone (2016), “Charting the elements of pedagogic frailty”, Educational Research, vol. 58, núm. 1, pp. 1-23, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2015.1129115>.
Kirkwood, Adrian y Linda Price (2014), “Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is «enhanced» and how do we know? A critical literature review”, Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 39, núm. 1, pp. 6-36, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404>.
Kostromina, Svetlana Nikolaevna, Daria Sergeevna Gnedykh y Ekaterina Aleksandrovna Ruschack (2017), “Russian university teachers’ ideas about pedagogic frailty”, Knowledge Management & E-Learning, vol. 9, núm. 3, pp. 311-328, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2017.09.019>.
Kryukov, Vladimir y Alexey Gorin (2017), “Digital technologies as education innovation at universities”, Australian Educational Computing, vol. 32, núm. 1, <http://www.journal.acce.edu.au/index.php/AEC/article/view/114>.
Laidoune, Abdelbaki, Chaher Zid y Nabil Sahraoui (2022), “Innovate and overcome resistance to change to improve the resilience of systems and organizations”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 13, pp. 2 986-3 001, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021- 00840-8>.
Land, Ray (2017), “Enhancing quality to address frailty”, en Ian M. Kinchin y Naomi E. Winstone (eds.), Pedagogic frailty and resilience in the university, Rotterdam, Sense Publishers, pp. 179-194, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-983-6_13>.
Latorre-Cosculluela, Cecilia, Verónica Sierra-Sánchez, Pilar Rivera-Torres y Marta Liesa-Orús (2024), “ICT efficacy and response to different needs in university classrooms: effects on attitudes and active behaviour towards technology”, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, vol. 36, núm. 2, pp. 350-367, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09357-2>.
Laurillard, Diana (2012), Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology, Nueva York, Routledge, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203125083>.
Marín, Victoria I., Linda Castañeda, L., Ximena Forero, Araceli Camacho, Patrícia Scherer Bassani, y Lucila Pérez (2025), “Instructors’ perspectives on personal learning environments in higher education: Unravelling the threads of assemblage, agency, and pedagogic frailty”, International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 132, pp. 1-19, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102629>.
Martín Sanz, Noemy, María Dolores Vivas Urías, Leire Nuere Salgado, Noelia Valle Benítez y María Consuelo Valbuena Martínez (2023), “Educate to transform: An innovative experience for faculty training”, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, núm. 2, pp. 1613-1635, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11160-y>.
Mercader, Cristina y Joaquín Gairín (2020), “University teachers’ perception of barriers to the use of digital technologies: The importance of the institutional environment”, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 17, núm. 4, pp. 1-14, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0182-x>.
Naoreen, Bushra, Muhammad Naeem Mohsin, y Shamaiela Mehboob Ali Farooqi (2020), “University teachers’ perceptions of self-efficacy and its relationship with workplace stress”, Global Social Sciences Review, vol. 5, núm. 2, pp. 182-189, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-II).17>.
Nowak, Radoslaw M. (2023), “How resistance to change impairs innovation”, Journal of Strategy and Management, vol. 16, núm. 4, pp. 609-629, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-08-2022-0144>. OECD (2021), Digital education outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with artificial intelligence, blockchain and robots, París, OECD Publishing, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-en>.
Padilla Partida, Siria, Carlos Iván Moreno y Rosario Hernández Castañeda (2015), “Barriers for ICT best practices. Case study”, Innoeduca. International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation, vol. 1, núm. 2, pp. 80-90, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.20548/innoeduca.2015.v1i2.1044>.
Paz Saavedra, Luis Eduardo y Mercè Gisbert Cervera (2023), “Autopercepción del profesorado universitario sobre la competencia digital docente”, Educar, vol. 59, núm. 2, pp. 437-455, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.1614>.
Puentedura, Ruben R. (2016), The SAMR Model: Technological Integration into Higher Education, <http://hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2016/07/SAMRModel_TechnologicalIntegrationIntoHigherEducation.pdf>.
Rahimi, Amir Reza y Dara Tafazoli (2022), “The role of university teachers’ 21st-century digital competence in their attitudes toward ICT integration in higher education: Extending the theory of planned behavior”, The JALT CALL Journal, vol. 18, núm. 2, pp. 238-263, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v18n2.632>.
Rehman, Zia Ur, Wajeeha Aurangzeb y Rubana Saeed (2022), “Reflections on adopting SAMR model for technology integration at university level: A phenomenological study from Pakistan”, Journal of Social Sciences Advancement, vol. 3, núm. 3, pp. 117-129, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.52223/JSSA22-030303-39>.
Roca, André y Paul R. Ford (2021), “Developmental activities in the acquisition of creativity in soccer players”, Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 41, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100850>.
Rodríguez Hoyos, Carlos, Aquilina Fueyo Gutiérrez e Isabel Hevia Artime (2021), “Competencias digitales del profesorado para innovar en la docencia universitaria: analizando el uso de los dispositivos móviles”, Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, vol. 61, pp. 71-97, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.86305>.
Romero-García, Carmen, Olga Buzón-García y Patricia de Paz-Lugo (2020), “Improving future teachers’ digital competence using active methodologies”, Sustainability, vol. 12, núm. 18, pp. 1-15, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187798>.
Salinas, Jesús (2004), “Innovación docente y uso de las TIC en la enseñanza universitaria”, Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC), vol. 1, núm. 1, <https://rusc.uoc.edu/rusc/es/index.php/rusc/article/download/v1n1-salinas/228-1150-2-PB.pdf>.
Tondeur, Jo, Johan van Braak, Peggy A. Ertmer y Anne Ottenbreit-Leftwich (2017), “Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence”, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 65, núm. 3, pp. 555-575, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9492-z>.
Uchima-Marin, Cristina, Julian Murillo, Luis Salvador-Acosta y Patricia Acosta-Vargas (2024), “Integration of technological tools in teaching statistics: Innovations in educational technology for sustainable education”, Sustainability, vol. 16, núm. 19, pp. 1-17, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198344>.
Urbina, Santos, Adolfina Pérez Garcias, Bárbara de-Benito y Jesús Salinas (2024), “Constituent elements of pedagogic frailty linked to teaching innovation with digital technologies”, en T. Bastiaens (ed.), Proceedings of EdMedia + Innovate Learning, Bruselas, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp. 390-397, <https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/ p/224544>.
Uys, Philippus M. y Cathy Gunn (2012), “Breaking the rules: Supporting learning and teaching technology innovations”, ponencia presentada en ASCILITE 2012: 29th International Conference on Innovation, Practice and Research in the Use of Educational Technologies in Tertiary Education, pp. 1-19, Wellington, Massey University, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2012.1541>.
Wang, Taojing, Tingting Dai, Liming Yang, Lemara Osmanova y Delight Hwarari (2026), “Digital innovation in higher education: comparing approaches in developed and developing countries”, Frontiers in Education, vol. 10, id: 1723087, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1723087>.
Wei, Guo, Bity Salwana Alias y Aida Hanim A Hamid (2025), “Digital teaching innovation in education: A systematic review”, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 24, núm. 12, pp. 849-871, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.12.36>.
Zhang, Ying y Yuan-Cheng Chang (2023), “Influence of perceived organizational support on work engagement of university physical education teachers in Hubei Province, China”, Educational Research and Reviews, vol. 18, núm. 10, pp. 281-290, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.5897/err2023.4352>.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Universidad Autónoma de México
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
